Sources: Futurepedia guide (Skills 3 and 5) + YouTube transcript (Skill 6 and 7)
Four content production skills: paste a transcript and get a week of social posts, LinkedIn posts written in your voice, a YouTube launch kit, and a full editorial calendar.
Skill 3: Hyper-Personalised Content Engine
What it does: paste a raw video or podcast transcript and get a week of LinkedIn posts, X/Twitter threads, and an SEO article, all in your brand voice. Mines the transcript for the real ideas rather than just summarising it.
---
name: content-engine
description: >
When I paste a video transcript, podcast transcript, or any long-form source
content and ask for social posts, LinkedIn posts, threads, or an article,
load the content engine skill and run the full repurposing workflow.
Always load the brand-voice skill alongside this one.
---
# Content Engine
## Step 1: Mine the source, do not summarise it
Before writing anything, extract from the transcript:
- The 3 most shareable claims or contrarian takes
- The 1 specific story, result, or example that proves the main point
- The vocabulary the speaker uses (their exact words, not polished paraphrases)
- Any numbers, names, or specific details that could serve as hooks
Do not summarise the content. Mine it. There is a difference.
## Step 2: Produce the week of content
From one transcript, produce:
1. THREE LinkedIn posts
- Each must use a different hook mechanism (contrarian / specific number / story opener)
- Each must stand alone: a reader who sees only this post gets full value
- Under 200 words each
- Apply brand-voice skill throughout
- End with one CTA: a question, a comment keyword, or a follow prompt
2. TWO X/Twitter threads
- Thread 1: list format (5-7 tweets, each one a standalone insight)
- Thread 2: story format (hook tweet, 4-5 build tweets, closer with CTA)
- Hook tweet must work standalone if the reader does not click More
- Under 280 characters per tweet
3. ONE SEO article outline
- Target a specific search query the content answers (state it explicitly)
- H1 as a question
- 4-6 H2s as sub-questions
- Answer Block (40-60 words answering the H1 directly, goes in first 100 words)
- Key Takeaways section
- FAQ (4 questions, edge cases not restatements of H2s)
## Rules
- Never use the same hook mechanism twice in the same content set
- Never invent a stat that was not in the source material
- Never write a generic opener: every first line must earn the second
- Apply brand-voice skill to all outputs
- Flag any section where the source did not give you enough material
Skill 4: LinkedIn Post Writer
What it does: writes a single LinkedIn post in your brand voice using a selected hook formula. Applies the content moat check before returning the draft. More controlled than the content engine when you have one specific idea.
---
name: linkedin-post-writer
description: >
When I say write a LinkedIn post, draft a post, or give me a LinkedIn post about
[TOPIC], load this skill. Always load brand-voice and audience-profile alongside it.
---
# LinkedIn Post Writer
## Before writing
Ask me two things if I have not provided them:
1. What is the one idea this post is about? (One sentence)
2. What is the specific proof, example, or number behind it?
If I have provided both, skip the questions and write.
## Hook selection
Select one hook mechanism based on the idea:
| Hook type | Use when |
|---|---|
| Specific number | There is a stat, metric, or count that surprises |
| Contrarian claim | The post challenges something most people believe |
| Story opener | There is a specific moment, failure, or result to lead with |
| ICP direct address | The post is written for a specific title or situation |
| Stakes escalation | The post reveals a consequence most people have not considered |
| Progressive milestone | The post is a before/after or growth narrative |
Name the hook type used at the top of your output so I can review the choice.
## The content moat check
Before returning the draft, check:
1. Is there a narrative, data, or physical moat in this content?
2. Could this exact post have been written by someone who typed the topic into Claude?
3. Is there at least one specific detail (a name, a number, a quote, a date) that only the author could have included?
If question 2 is yes: add one bracketed placeholder [SPECIFIC DETAIL NEEDED] where the author must add their own experience before posting.
## Output format
Return:
- Hook type used
- The post (under 200 words)
- One suggested CTA (comment keyword, question, or follow prompt)
- One suggested A/B hook variant using a different mechanism
## Rules
- No em dashes anywhere
- No hashtags in the body
- One idea per line
- Three lines maximum per paragraph
- Never start with I, We, or the company name
- Apply brand-voice skill throughout
Skill 5: YouTube Launch Kit
What it does: paste a YouTube transcript and get back five title options, a search-friendly description, timestamped chapters pulled from the actual content, tags, thumbnail text ideas, and a pinned comment ready to drive engagement.
---
name: youtube-launch-kit
description: >
When I paste a YouTube video transcript and ask for titles, description, chapters,
tags, or anything to do with publishing a YouTube video, load this skill.
---
# YouTube Launch Kit
## Step 1: Analyse the transcript
Before writing anything, identify:
- The core question or promise this video answers
- The most surprising or specific claim in the video
- The key moments where the topic shifts (these become chapters)
- The vocabulary the creator uses (their words, not YouTube-optimised paraphrases)
## Step 2: Produce the full launch kit
### Titles (5 options)
Write 5 title options across these formulas:
1. How to [SPECIFIC OUTCOME] without [COMMON OBSTACLE] (under 60 characters)
2. I [DID SOMETHING] for [TIME PERIOD]. Here is what happened. (curiosity/story)
3. The [SPECIFIC NUMBER] [THING] that [SPECIFIC OUTCOME] ([NUMBER] in [TIMEFRAME]) (proof-led)
4. Why [COMMON BELIEF] is wrong (and what to do instead) (contrarian)
5. [SPECIFIC AUDIENCE]: [SPECIFIC PROMISE] (direct address)
For each title: mark it as SHORT (under 50 chars) or FULL (50-70 chars).
### Description
Structure:
- First 125 characters: the hook (appears before Show More, must earn the click)
- Lines 2-4: what the video covers in plain language (not a summary, a promise)
- 3-5 bullet points of specific things the viewer will learn or get
- Timestamps block (from Step 3 below)
- 1-2 relevant links (if provided)
- CTA: subscribe, comment prompt, or relevant offer
### Chapters (timestamped)
Pull from the actual transcript. Format:
0:00 [Intro or Hook moment]
[TIMESTAMP] [Chapter title - 4 words max, no clickbait]
[TIMESTAMP] [Chapter title]
[TIMESTAMP] [Chapter title]
[TIMESTAMP] [Outro or CTA]
Do not invent timestamps. Use the actual structure of the transcript.
### Tags (10-15)
Mix of: exact match (what the video is literally about), related terms (adjacent topics), and long-tail phrases (specific questions this video answers). No generic one-word tags.
### Thumbnail text (3 options)
Under 5 words each. Must work at thumbnail size (visible from across the room).
Option A: Number-led
Option B: Outcome-led
Option C: Curiosity-led
### Pinned comment
Under 100 words. Includes: one sentence on what the video covers, one soft CTA (subscribe, comment keyword, or question to drive replies). Sounds human, not promotional.
## Rules
- Never invent a timestamp. Pull only from what is in the transcript.
- Titles must be specific. No generic YouTube formulas with empty brackets.
- Description first 125 characters must not start with the channel name.
Skill 6: Editorial Calendar Builder
What it does: takes your content pillars, posting frequency, and channel mix and builds a 4-week editorial calendar. Includes post angles, hook types, formats, and which pillar each post serves. Anti-repetition logic prevents the same mechanism appearing twice in one week.
---
name: editorial-calendar
description: >
When I ask to plan my content, build a content calendar, schedule posts,
or plan [N] weeks of LinkedIn content, load this skill.
---
# Editorial Calendar Builder
## Step 1: Intake
Ask me if I have not already provided:
1. Content pillars: what are the 3-5 topics I post about with authority?
2. Posting frequency: how many posts per week per channel?
3. Channels: LinkedIn only / LinkedIn + X / LinkedIn + X + Instagram?
4. Any upcoming events, launches, or topics that must appear in this period?
5. Any formats I want to test this month (carousel, video, lead magnet post)?
## Step 2: Build the calendar
For each post slot, produce:
- Date and channel
- Pillar it serves
- Post angle (the specific idea, not just the topic)
- Hook type (contrarian / number / story / ICP address / stakes / milestone)
- Format (text post / carousel / lead magnet CTA / video script brief)
- Lead magnet opportunity (yes/no, and if yes, what the CTA would be)
Format as a table:
| Date | Channel | Pillar | Angle | Hook type | Format | Lead magnet? |
## Anti-repetition rules
- No hook type appears more than twice in the same week
- No pillar appears more than twice in the same week (unless only one pillar exists)
- No two consecutive posts use the same format
- At least one lead magnet CTA post per two weeks
## Step 3: Return a second output
After the calendar table, return a list of the 3 posts most likely to perform well and why, based on hook strength and pillar demand for this ICP.
## Rules
- Never schedule the same angle twice (even in different formats)
- Apply brand-voice skill to any copy you write within the calendar
- Flag any week that is heavily weighted toward one pillar